针对他人twitter上的争论,其实antirez正文写的是很平淡客观的,今天偶然翻看评论,antirez对一位留言者做了回复,这里不难明白作者标题的含义了
Dermot Haughey留言:
|
|
antirez回复:
Unfortunately they win points... in some way. An example with a person
that is not very famous in the community nor was involved in this tweets
exchange: there was this early times Redis user that always tried to
contribute, which was fine. However all hits contribs where
half-finished, or broken, or some other problem like that, so I politely
refused the contribs. He got frustrated and started to point the finger
at me for me distributed systems misunderstandings, and so forth, and
started to write blog posts about abstract concepts that made he seem
smart. No real content, no real code shipped for years, just blabla, and
endorsing systems which are super safe during partitions and all the
rest is shit and so forth. Know what? He started to be hired by
companies in this space. However if you look at the hires story you see
him jumping each 6 months to a new company since the fact he is not able
to actually do work is something people eventually realize. Now every
time there is some Redis drama and he adds his voice I think that in
this world we can't have good things, really.